
This Act works the opposite way round — the ceremony decides validity, not the registration. Who may solemnise under Section 5, the hours and notice nobody mentions, and why the civil route is usually the answer where one partner is Christian.
Quick answer: For a marriage where one or both parties is Christian, section 4 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 requires solemnisation under section 5 — and a marriage solemnised otherwise “shall be void”. So the first question is who is solemnising it, not how to register it. Section 5 lists five: Episcopal ordination (by that Church's rites), a Clergyman of the Church of Scotland, a Minister of Religion licensed under the Act, by or before a Marriage Registrar appointed under the Act, or a person licensed to grant certificates between Indian Christians (section 60: man not under 21, woman not under 18, no living spouse, two credible witnesses other than that person). Also regulated: hours — six in the morning to seven in the evening (s.10), place (s.11), notice (s.12, s.38), and registration is mandatory under s.27. Where one partner is Christian we recommend the Special Marriage Act, which avoids the section 4 question entirely. We do not solemnise Christian marriages.
Everywhere else on this site we say the same reassuring thing: your marriage is complete at the ceremony, and registration only records it. Order 8 of Delhi's 2014 Order says registration "will not tantamount to validity of marriage". That is true for a Hindu marriage, a Sikh marriage, an Arya Samaj wedding.
For a marriage involving a Christian, the Act works the other way round — and nobody warns couples about it.
Section 4 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872:
"Every marriage between persons, one or both of whom is or are a Christian … shall be solemnized in accordance with the provisions of the next following section; and any such marriage solemnized otherwise than in accordance with such provisions shall be void."
Read that twice. It is not a registration rule. It is a rule about who may solemnise the marriage, and the consequence of getting it wrong is not a delay or a penalty — it is that the marriage is void.
So for a Christian couple, and for any couple where one party is Christian, the first question is not "how do we register this". It is:
Who solemnised the marriage, and were they a person authorised to do so?
That question is answered by section 5, and the next section of this page sets out its five categories exactly as the Act does. Everything else here — notice, hours, place, registration, the certificate — follows from getting section 5 right first.
Why this page exists at all. Because Delhi's Revenue Department publishes a marriage-registration page setting out the Hindu Marriage Act route and the Special Marriage Act route, and does not mention this Act. So a Christian couple, or an inter-faith couple with a Christian partner, gets told "register under the Hindu Marriage Act" or "just do court marriage" — one of which may be wrong for them and one of which is usually exactly right. The difference is worth a page.
And the honest limit on what we do, stated before anything else. We do not solemnise Christian marriages. A church wedding is conducted by a person authorised under section 5 — an ordained minister, a licensed Minister of Religion — in accordance with that Church's rules and rites. It is not something a marriage service arranges, and anybody offering you a "Christian marriage package" with a ceremony attached is offering something they should not.
Our own ceremony is an Arya Samaj (Vedic) ceremony, which — and this is the part that matters legally rather than culturally — is not one of the five categories in section 5. What we handle for Christian and inter-faith couples is the Special Marriage Act route and the registration and certificate work, which is set out further down.
This is the list the whole subject turns on. A marriage where one or both parties is Christian must be solemnised by one of these, or section 4 makes it void.
| # | Who | The condition attached |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Any person who has received Episcopal ordination | Provided the marriage is solemnised "according to the rules, rites, ceremonies and customs of the Church of which he is a Minister" |
| 2 | Any Clergyman of the Church of Scotland | Provided it is solemnised according to the rules, rites, ceremonies and customs of the Church of Scotland |
| 3 | Any Minister of Religion licensed under this Act to solemnize marriages | The licence is the thing. Ask. This is the category where assumptions are made |
| 4 | By, or in the presence of, a Marriage Registrar appointed under this Act | The Act's own civil route |
| 5 | Any person licensed under this Act to grant certificates of marriage between Indian Christians | See section 60 below, which sets the conditions for that route |
The practical instruction that follows, and it is the single most useful sentence on this page: before the wedding, ask the person who will solemnise it which of those five he falls under. Not in a suspicious way — in the same way you would check a venue's dates. An ordained minister of an episcopal church, marrying you by his Church's own rites, is category one and there is nothing to worry about. A pastor of an independent congregation may or may not hold a licence under the Act, and "we have done hundreds of weddings" is not the answer to that question.
Notice also what each of the first two categories carries with it. They are not simply permissions to marry people; they are permissions to marry people according to that Church's rules, rites, ceremonies and customs. So a ceremony that departs substantially from those rites is not automatically covered just because the person conducting it is ordained. In practice this is rarely a problem, because churches marry couples the way their Church marries couples. It is worth knowing all the same.
Short, specific, and almost never mentioned by anybody arranging a wedding.
The hours. Section 10 provides that every marriage under the Act shall be solemnised between the hours of six in the morning and seven in the evening, with exceptions for certain churches. So a late-evening ceremony is not simply an unusual choice — for a marriage under this Act it is outside the window the Act sets, unless an exception applies to that church.
The place. Section 11 deals with where a marriage may be solemnised — for clergy of the Church of England, in a church where marriages may be solemnised, with the Act making allowance where there is no such church within five miles, and providing for a special episcopal licence. If your wedding is planned somewhere other than a church — a hall, a garden, a hotel — that is the question to put to the officiant early, because it is his authority that is affected, not your arrangements.
The notice. Section 12 requires one of the parties to give notice in writing containing the names, professions or conditions, dwelling places, how long each has dwelt there, and the place at which the marriage is to be solemnised. And where the marriage is to be before a Marriage Registrar, section 38 sets out the corresponding notice to the Registrar or Registrars concerned.
Why we set these out rather than skipping them. Because they are the three things a couple discovers afterwards, when a document is being examined by somebody with a reason to examine it — a foreign mission, an insurer, a court in a succession matter. A marriage solemnised at nine in the evening, in a hall, by somebody whose licence nobody asked about, is a marriage with three questions attached to it. Every one of those three questions is free to answer beforehand and expensive to answer later.
So: ask the hours, ask the place, ask about the notice, and ask which of the five categories the officiant falls under. Four questions, one conversation.
Another place where this Act differs from everything else on this site.
Section 27 provides that all marriages solemnised in India between persons one or both of whom professes the Christian religion "shall be registered in manner hereinafter prescribed". Not "may be". Not "should be, within sixty days, or pay a fee". Shall be.
And the registration is built into the ceremony rather than bolted on afterwards. Where the marriage is solemnised by a minister, the Act's own Part on registration provides for the certificate to be entered and signed at the time — which is why, in practice, a couple married in a church walks away holding something, rather than starting an application the following week.
| Marriage involving a Christian, under this Act | Hindu / Sikh marriage in Delhi | |
|---|---|---|
| Does the ceremony itself have to comply? | Yes — section 4 makes a non-complying marriage void | Section 7(1) recognises the customary rites of either party |
| Is registration mandatory in the Act? | Yes — section 27 says such marriages "shall be registered" | Delhi's 2014 Order requires reporting within 60 days, with condonation and a penalty beyond |
| Does registration decide validity? | The solemnisation decides validity. Registration is a separate mandatory duty | No — Order 8: registration "will not tantamount to validity of marriage" |
| Are the hours regulated? | Yes — section 10, six in the morning to seven in the evening, with exceptions | No |
| Is notice required? | Yes — section 12, and section 38 where it is before a Marriage Registrar | No notice on the Hindu Marriage Act route |
| Who may solemnise? | Only the five categories in section 5 | Anybody performing the customary rites of either party |
The lesson from that table, in one line: on this Act, the care goes into the wedding, not into the paperwork afterwards. Which is the opposite of the advice most couples are given.
The fifth category in section 5 is a person licensed to grant certificates of marriage between Indian Christians, and section 60 sets the conditions for that route. Three of them, and they are worth knowing precisely.
| Condition | What section 60 requires |
|---|---|
| (1) Age | "the age of the man intending to be married shall not be under twenty-one years, and the age of the woman intending to be married shall not be under eighteen years" |
| (2) No living spouse | "neither of the persons intending to be married shall have a wife or husband still living" |
| (3) Declaration before witnesses | In the presence of a person licensed under section 9, and of at least two credible witnesses other than that person, each party says to the other the words the Act prescribes |
Three things to take from that.
One — the ages are 21 and 18, in the Act itself. Not a local rule, not a practice. And as everywhere else on this site: we do not touch an under-age marriage, by a day. If somebody tells you it can be "managed", they are describing a criminal act and pointing you at it.
Two — "shall not have a wife or husband still living" is the same wall you meet on every other Act. A pending divorce case is not a divorce. Where there was an earlier marriage, the question is whether the decree is final — and our remarriage after divorce page works through what that actually requires, including the ninety-day appeal window that most people count as thirty.
Three — the witnesses are part of the ceremony, not the file. At least two credible witnesses, other than the licensed person. So the officiant does not count as one of them, which is the mistake people make when a small wedding is arranged. Our witnesses page sets out what a witness is doing and why we never supply one.
One short section, and it belongs on any honest page about this Act.
Section 88 provides that "nothing in this Act shall be deemed to validate any marriage which the personal law applicable to either of the parties forbids him or her to enter into."
So complying with this Act does not override a prohibition that the personal law applicable to either party imposes — prohibited degrees of relationship being the ordinary example. The Act gives a valid form of solemnisation; it does not make a forbidden marriage permissible.
Why we point this out. Because a couple who has read section 5 carefully sometimes concludes that a church wedding settles every question. It settles the question section 5 asks. Where there is any question about relationship, an earlier marriage, or a prohibition under either party's personal law, that needs looking at separately and by an advocate — not by us, and not by an officiant who is being asked about something outside his own rules.
This is the situation we get calls about most, and it is the one where bad advice does the most damage.
Go back to the words of section 4: it applies to every marriage between persons "one or both of whom is or are a Christian". One. So a Hindu–Christian marriage, a Sikh–Christian marriage, a Muslim–Christian marriage — each of them is a marriage to which section 4 speaks.
The consequence, and please take it seriously. If one of you is Christian, and the marriage is solemnised by a ceremony that is not one of the five categories in section 5 — for example an Arya Samaj ceremony, which we ourselves perform and which is not in that list — then section 4 is engaged and the position is not one we will guess about on a website.
So here is what we actually do. Where one party is Christian and the couple wants a single, unarguable route, we recommend the Special Marriage Act — the civil route, which is a complete Act of its own, requires nobody to change religion, and produces a certificate no office argues with. That is the honest answer, it is the answer we give on the phone, and it is the answer even though our Arya Samaj ceremony is cheaper.
What the Special Marriage Act route involves, in short, because the detail is on our court marriage page: notice under section 5 of that Act; publication under section 6 in the Marriage Notice Book and in the office; a thirty-day window in which any person may object under section 7; the declaration before the Marriage Officer and three witnesses under sections 11 and 12; and the certificate under section 13. Add the clock nobody watches — section 14, under which the notice lapses if the marriage is not solemnised within three calendar months from the date the notice was given, so the usable window is nearer two months than three; the full arithmetic is on our appointment page.
And the thing to decide with your eyes open: that thirty-day notice is public. For a couple whose families are not yet reconciled to the marriage, that is the fact the whole plan turns on, and it deserves a proper conversation rather than a footnote — our inter-religion marriage page and love marriage page both deal with it.
What we will not do: tell an inter-faith couple with a Christian partner that an Arya Samaj ceremony is a complete answer for them. It is a ceremony we believe in and perform every week. It is not the right instrument for this situation, and saying so costs us work we would rather not have.
We check this before writing about any route, and the answer here shapes everything.
The Delhi Revenue Department's marriage-registration page sets out two routes and two only: registration under the Hindu Marriage Act — fee of ₹100 deposited with the Marriage Clerk, response "normally within 15 days" — and the Special Marriage Act, with solemnisation fee of ₹15 deposited with the cashier of the District and a response "normally within 60 days", at a counter open 9.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. on any working day.
It does not mention the Indian Christian Marriage Act at all.
That is not a criticism of the department; registration under this Act runs through its own machinery — a minister's register, or a Marriage Registrar appointed under the Act — rather than through the SDM's marriage counter. But it does explain three things a Christian couple experiences:
One — why nobody at the counter offers you this route. It is not on their page and it is not their register.
Two — why "just do court marriage" is the answer you get. Often it is the right answer. But it should be a recommendation, not a default caused by a silence.
Three — why your church's paperwork matters more than you think. On this route the certificate comes from the solemnisation itself. If your church keeps its register properly and gives you the certificate on the day, you are in a good position. If it does not, that is the gap to close — and closing it years later is the hardest version of this job, as our late registration page shows for every other Act.
So the honest practical position for a Christian couple in Delhi, stated plainly. If you are marrying in a church, by a person authorised under section 5, according to that Church's rites — your route is that ceremony and its registration, and your most important document is what the church gives you. Ask for it on the day, check it before you leave, and ask for a register extract naming the entry rather than only a printed certificate.
If you want a certificate from the State's own civil machinery — because a mission, an employer or a foreign registrar will want something familiar — the Special Marriage Act route gives you exactly that, and it is the route we handle.
We say this on every page and it belongs here most, because on this route there is no second counter to catch a mistake.
| # | Check | Against |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The groom's name | His strongest identity document, character by character |
| 2 | The bride's name | Hers, the same way |
| 3 | Both fathers' names | Your own identity documents |
| 4 | Both dates of birth | Birth certificate or matriculation |
| 5 | The date of the marriage | The date the ceremony actually took place |
| 6 | The place, and the church's own name | As the church names itself, not as people call it locally |
| 7 | The name and capacity of the person who solemnised it | The section 5 category — this is the field unique to this route, and the one nobody checks |
| 8 | The entry or register number, and the date of registration | Write them down separately, in a notes app as well |
Say it that day, at that desk, if anything is wrong. At that moment it is a correction while the register is open in front of somebody. Six months later it is an application to an institution that has moved on — and correcting a marriage record is slow everywhere, for the reasons our correction page sets out.
And keep three things together, permanently: the certificate, a register extract if you can get one, and a note of the entry number, the date and the church. Those three answer every question anybody will ever ask you about this marriage.
Common for Christian couples, and the chain is the same as for any Indian marriage document — with one extra thing to check at the start.
The chain: the certificate, then state-level authentication where required, then MEA apostille for a country that is a member of the Hague Apostille Convention or MEA attestation plus that country's embassy where it is not, then certified translation last. The Ministry's own page states that normal attestation is free and apostille is ₹50 per document per page — so any large figure quoted as "the MEA fee" is somebody's service charge. Our NRI marriage page sets the whole chain out, and our single status page covers the declaration that usually travels with it.
The extra thing to check, which is specific to this route: whether the receiving authority will accept a certificate issued under a church's register, or wants one from a State Marriage Registrar. Most will take the certificate as it is. Some want the State's own document. Ask them in writing before you assemble anything — because if the answer is the second one, the Special Marriage Act route gives you that, and finding out early is the difference between one chain and two.
And the ordinary warning, which applies here as everywhere: do not start correcting or adding documents in the middle of a live visa or passport file. Finish that, then do this.
Precisely, because this page sits next to a service that performs a different ceremony.
We do not solemnise Christian marriages. Section 5 lists who may, and a marriage service is not on that list. A church wedding is conducted by an ordained minister or a licensed Minister of Religion, according to that Church's rules and rites.
We do not describe our ceremony as a Christian marriage, or offer a "church-style" ceremony. We perform Arya Samaj (Vedic) ceremonies. For a couple where one party is Christian, that ceremony is not one of the five categories in section 5, and we will say so rather than take the booking.
What we do handle: the Special Marriage Act route end to end, for a Christian couple or an inter-faith couple who want the State's civil certificate; the documents and affidavits; the registration and certificate work; duplicates and corrections; and the apostille and embassy chain where the certificate travels.
And the lines that do not move, on this page as on every other: never an under-age marriage; never while an earlier marriage subsists; never a back-dated document; never a supplied witness; never a promised appointment date; and never a ceremony described as something it was not.
Because section 4 exists, this conversation does happen — usually years later, and usually when something else is being examined.
First, do not act on the opinion of whoever told you. An insurer's clerk, a bank officer, a relative or a website is not the person who decides this. Section 4 is a serious provision and a question under it is a question for an advocate looking at your actual facts — who solemnised the marriage, in what capacity, under which of the five categories, where, and what was registered.
Second, gather rather than argue. The certificate. Any register extract. The name and capacity of the person who solemnised it. The church's own records. Photographs. The invitation. Whatever the notice was. That is the material an advocate needs, and collecting it is the useful thing you can do this week.
Third, know that there is usually a way forward, and that it is not a trick. Where a marriage is genuinely in doubt, couples can and do marry again properly — commonly under the Special Marriage Act, which is complete in itself and produces a certificate nobody argues with. It is not an admission of anything. It is the same instinct as fixing a document before it is needed.
What we will not do in that conversation. We will not tell you your marriage is fine to keep the booking, and we will not tell you it is void to sell you a second wedding. Both are things a service can profit from and both are wrong. We will tell you that it is a question for an advocate, help you gather the papers, and be there for whichever route the answer turns out to be.
One — "registration is what makes it legal." Not on this Act. Section 4 makes the solemnisation decisive: a marriage involving a Christian, solemnised otherwise than under section 5, is void. Registration under section 27 is a separate mandatory duty.
Two — "any pastor can marry us." Only if he falls within one of the five categories in section 5 — which for a Minister of Religion means licensed under the Act. Ask. "We have done hundreds of weddings" is not an answer.
Three — "the Act only applies if we are both Christian." Section 4 says "one or both of whom is or are a Christian". One is enough.
Four — "we will have an Arya Samaj ceremony instead, it is simpler." That ceremony is not in section 5. For a couple with a Christian party, the clean answer is the Special Marriage Act, and we say so even though it is not our cheapest service.
Five — "the time of the wedding does not matter." Section 10 sets the hours at six in the morning to seven in the evening, with exceptions for certain churches.
Six — "we can marry anywhere we like." Section 11 deals with place, including the five-mile allowance and the special episcopal licence. Ask the officiant before booking a venue, because it is his authority that is affected.
Seven — "no notice is needed." Section 12 requires a written notice with names, professions, dwelling places, how long each has dwelt there and the place of solemnisation; section 38 covers notice to a Marriage Registrar.
Eight — "the priest counts as one of our witnesses." Under section 60 the two credible witnesses must be other than the licensed person.
Nine — "a church wedding settles every question." Section 88 says nothing in the Act validates a marriage that the personal law applicable to either party forbids.
Ten — "somebody will arrange the church ceremony for us." Not a marriage service, and not us. A "Christian marriage package" with a ceremony attached is something nobody should be selling you.
Published, identical for everyone, and told to you before you pay. No surcharge for urgency, distance, caste or religion.
| Service | Fee | When this is your row |
|---|---|---|
| Special Marriage Act, full civil route | ₹15,000 | The usual answer for a Christian or inter-faith couple who want the State's own certificate. Thirty-day notice applies |
| Marriage registration, full service | ₹12,000 | An older marriage where the proof has to be rebuilt from the church's records upwards |
| Duplicate marriage certificate | ₹2,500 | A correct certificate, lost or damaged |
| Correction of a register entry | Ask | The certificate is wrong — priced on what has to be proved |
| MEA apostille handling | ₹4,500 | Plus the government's ₹50 per document / per page. Normal MEA attestation is free |
| NRI marriage + MEA apostille | ₹20,000 | Where the certificate has to travel |
| NRI apostille + embassy attestation | ₹30,000 | The full non-Hague chain |
| Christian / church ceremony | Not offered | Section 5 lists who may solemnise, and a marriage service is not on that list |
| Arya Samaj ceremony, or with registration | ₹5,100 / ₹7,100 | A different rite, and not a section 5 category — so not the route where one party is Christian |
| Government fees | ₹15 / ₹100 / ₹200 | ₹15 Special Marriage Act solemnisation with the cashier of the District; ₹100 Hindu Marriage Act registration with the Marriage Clerk; ₹200 the 2014 Order's requisite fee. Take the receipt |
Not included, and said before you pay: government fees as above; notary at ₹100–₹200 per affidavit; anything the church itself charges; obtaining a register extract or a certified copy of a decree or death certificate; apostille, embassy attestation and certified translation where the certificate travels; and travel. The full list is on our fees page.
What we will not take money for, ever: a Christian or church ceremony; describing our Arya Samaj ceremony as a Christian marriage or as sufficient where one party is Christian; an opinion on whether an existing marriage is void, which is an advocate's work; a promised appointment date; supplied witnesses; an under-age marriage; or a marriage while an earlier one subsists.
Sourced. The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 — section 4, that every marriage between persons "one or both of whom is or are a Christian" shall be solemnised in accordance with section 5 and that a marriage solemnised otherwise "shall be void"; section 5, the five categories — a person who has received Episcopal ordination (marrying "according to the rules, rites, ceremonies and customs of the Church of which he is a Minister"), a Clergyman of the Church of Scotland (according to that Church's rules and rites), a Minister of Religion licensed under the Act, by or in the presence of a Marriage Registrar appointed under the Act, and a person licensed under the Act to grant certificates of marriage between Indian Christians; section 10, solemnisation "between the hours of six in the morning and seven in the evening" with exceptions for certain churches; section 11 on place, including the five-mile allowance and the special episcopal licence; section 12, the notice with names, professions or conditions, dwelling places, length of dwelling and the place of solemnisation; section 27, that such marriages "shall be registered in manner hereinafter prescribed"; section 38, notice where the marriage is before a Marriage Registrar; section 60, the man "not under twenty-one years" and the woman "not under eighteen years", neither having "a wife or husband still living", and the declaration before a person licensed under section 9 and at least two credible witnesses other than such person; and section 88, that "nothing in this Act shall be deemed to validate any marriage which the personal law applicable to either of the parties forbids him or her to enter into." The Special Marriage Act, 1954 — sections 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13 and 14. The Delhi Revenue Department's marriage-registration page — ₹100 and ₹15 and where each is deposited, "normally within 15 days" and "normally within 60 days", and counter hours of 9.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. on any working day; and the fact, which we checked, that this page sets out only the Hindu Marriage Act and Special Marriage Act routes and does not mention the Indian Christian Marriage Act. The Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014 — Order 4(b)'s ₹200 and Order 8. The Ministry of External Affairs attestation page — "Normal Attestation is free, a fee of Rs. 50/- per document/per page".
Not sourced, and we say so plainly. We have not set out how a particular church or diocese keeps its register, what it charges, or what it will hand you on the day — that varies by church and is a question for your church. We have not stated who in Delhi holds a licence under section 9 or is appointed a Marriage Registrar under the Act, because no public list is something we have verified; ask, and get the answer before the wedding. Nothing here is an opinion on whether any particular marriage is valid or void under section 4 — that turns on facts and is an advocate's question, and we say so rather than reassure or alarm. And whether a receiving authority abroad will accept a church-issued certificate or insist on a State Marriage Registrar's is the recipient's rule, not India's, so ask them in writing.
We are a marriage service, not a law firm. Where your matter needs an advocate we will say so instead of quoting a package.
One — whether one or both of you is Christian. It sounds obvious, and it is the fact that decides which Act is in play, because section 4 catches a marriage where one party is Christian.
Two — whether the marriage has already happened, and who solemnised it. If it has: the name and capacity of the person who conducted it, the church, the date, and whatever certificate you were given. If it has not: whether you want a church ceremony or the State's civil route.
Three — whether either of you was married before, and if so whether the decree is final — not filed, not settled, final. Section 60(2) and every other Act on this site stand on that one word.
Then the usual: where each of you lives, whether the certificate has to go abroad, whether any passport or visa file is open right now, and by when you need it.
On the first call we will tell you which route fits — and where that route is the church rather than us, you will hear that, and we will tell you what to check before the wedding rather than quote you for something we should not sell.
Call or WhatsApp +91 8376863962. Hindi or English.
Expert articles on every marriage topic — read before you decide
Complete 2026 process from notice to certificate.
Read Article →Full checklist — Aadhaar, affidavits, witnesses.
Read Article →Transparent breakdown — official + service costs.
Read Article →Your rights, family pressure, police protection.
Read Article →Apostille, Embassy NOC, spouse visa explained.
Read Article →Honest truth about Arya Samaj same-day option.
Read Article →