Arya Samaj Court Marriage Badarpur

Quick answer: The question this belt asks most is “Delhi se certificate bana lenge to Haryana mein chalega?” — and the answer is not in any marriage statute. It is in the Constitution. Article 261(1): “Full faith and credit shall be given throughout the territory of India to public acts, records and judicial proceedings of the Union and of every State.” Every phrase carries weight — full faith and credit, shall be given, throughout the territory of India, to records of every State. A register kept by a registering authority, and the certificate issued from it, is exactly such a record. Article 261(2) then leaves the manner of proving it “as provided by law made by Parliament”, and 261(3) makes final civil judgments “capable of execution anywhere within that territory”. Separately, Article 19(1)(e) gives every citizen the right “to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India” and 19(1)(d) “to move freely” through it — so a daily commute across that road is a right, not a weakness in your file. The practical consequence is worth money to you: there is no legal basis for registering the same marriage a second time in another State, and anybody offering to do it for a fee should be refused. We will not do it either. Honest limit: Article 261 binds the State and settles the law; it is not a remedy to wave at an awkward clerk. And Article 19(5) permits reasonable restrictions by law — which a court tests, not a counter. A wedding held years ago in a Haryana or UP village already married you under section 7; only the record is missing, and there is no cut-off. Ceremony ₹5,100, with registration ₹7,100, a wedding already held ₹6,000, civil route ₹15,000. We provide no witnesses, execute no decree, appear before no court — and if your file belongs on the Haryana side we say so before you pay a rupee.

The Constitution Answers the Question This Belt Asks Most

Stand at Badarpur border and Delhi ends. One side of the road is Delhi, the other is Haryana. The metro runs from here into Faridabad. Half the households in Molarband, Jaitpur, Tajpur Pahari and Meethapur have somebody working, studying, renting or holding land on the other side.

So the question we are asked from this belt more than any other is the simplest one imaginable: "Delhi se certificate bana lenge to Haryana mein chalega?"

It is a better question than it sounds, and it has an answer most people have never been shown — because the answer is not in any marriage statute. It is in the Constitution.

Article 261(1):

"Full faith and credit shall be given throughout the territory of India to public acts, records and judicial proceedings of the Union and of every State."

Read it slowly, because every part of that sentence is load-bearing.

"Full faith and credit." Not partial recognition, not a discretion to accept, not "may be considered". The phrase is as strong as constitutional drafting gets.

"Shall be given." Mandatory. The Constitution is not suggesting.

"Throughout the territory of India." Not between neighbouring States, not where reciprocity exists. Everywhere.

"To public acts, records and judicial proceedings." Three categories, and the middle one is the one that matters here. Records. A register maintained by a registering authority, and the certificate issued out of it, is precisely a public record of a State.

"Of the Union and of every State." Every one. Haryana is not entitled to treat a Delhi record as foreign, and Delhi is not entitled to treat a Haryana record as foreign.

What that means in plain terms for a household here. A marriage registered in Delhi is not a Delhi document in the sense people fear. It is a record of a State of India, and the Constitution directs that full faith and credit be given to it throughout the country — in Faridabad, in Gurugram, in Noida, in Patna, in Bengaluru.

And now the honest part, which we are not going to leave out. Article 261 is addressed to the State. It is a direction about how the organs of government across India are to treat each other's records. It does not mean a clerk at a counter will never be awkward with you. It does not give you a ready-made remedy to wave at somebody who is being difficult. What it means is that there is no legal foundation whatsoever for the idea that a marriage has to be registered again in another State, or that a Delhi certificate "does not count" across the border. Anybody who tells you otherwise — including anybody who offers, for a fee, to get you a second certificate in Haryana "to be safe" — is either mistaken or selling you something.

We do not register the same marriage twice, and we will not take money to do it. One marriage, one registration. That is the whole of it.

"As Provided by Law Made by Parliament" — How the Record Is Proved

Article 261 does not stop at clause (1). Clause (2) deals with the practical question, and it does something rather elegant: it hands the mechanics to Parliament.

Article 261(2):

"The manner in which and the conditions under which the acts, records and proceedings referred to in clause (1) shall be proved and the effect thereof determined shall be as provided by law made by Parliament."

So the Constitution supplies the obligation and Parliament supplies the method. The duty to give full faith and credit is constitutional; how you prove the record, and what effect it then has, is left to ordinary law — which in practice means the law of evidence.

And that is where a registered certificate shows its real strength. Indian evidence law divides documents into public and private, and a record of the acts of a public officer sits in the public class — which carries consequences for how it is proved that a private paper simply does not have. Our Jahangirpuri page sets out those provisions properly, including what the law says about an entry made by a public servant in the discharge of official duty. It is worth reading alongside this page, because the two halves fit together: Article 261 says the record must be honoured anywhere in India, and the evidence law says how that record is proved and why it is stronger than a photograph or a family's say-so.

The contrast with having no certificate is the point. A couple with a registered marriage has a public record that the Constitution directs the whole country to honour, proved by rules Parliament has already laid down. A couple without one is relying on the conduct and recollection of people who had special means of knowledge — a real route, set out on our Trilokpuri page, but one that works only inside a court, counts as a relevant fact rather than proof, and weakens every year as witnesses age. Across a State border, that difference is at its sharpest.

And Judgments Travel Too

The third clause is short and worth knowing, because it completes the picture for anybody whose matter ever reaches a court.

Article 261(3):

"Final judgments or orders delivered or passed by civil courts in any part of the territory of India shall be capable of execution anywhere within that territory according to law."

A final civil judgment is executable anywhere in India — "according to law", which means there is procedure to follow, but the territorial objection is answered at the constitutional level. A decree does not die at the Badarpur border any more than a record does.

Why mention it on a marriage page? Because the fear in this belt is not really about certificates. It is about a household split across a boundary and the suspicion that documents and orders somehow stop at the line on the map. The Constitution's answer, given three times in three clauses of one Article, is that they do not: records are honoured everywhere, the manner of proving them is settled by Parliament for the whole country, and final civil judgments are executable throughout the territory.

What we do not do, stated here because this clause invites the question. We execute nothing, we appear in no court, we conduct no proceedings, we enforce no order and we take no payment for any of that. If a household in this belt needs a decree executed or a matter pursued, that is an advocate's work, and free legal aid is available to a woman with no income test at all.

The Other Provision: You May Live on Either Side of That Road

There is a second constitutional answer this belt needs, and it goes to a different anxiety — not about the paper, but about the person.

Couples here ask it in various ways. "We live in Jaitpur but my job is in Faridabad — does that count against us?" "If we shift across the border after the wedding, does the registration become useless?" "Can they say we are not really Delhi people?"

Article 19(1) of the Constitution begins "All citizens shall have the right—" and then lists them. Two of those sub-clauses answer this directly:

(d) "to move freely throughout the territory of India;"

(e) "to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;"

To reside and settle in any part of the territory of India. It is a fundamental right, it belongs to every citizen, and it is as true in Molarband as anywhere else. Nobody has to justify living on this side of a boundary rather than the other, and nobody acquires or loses a legal status by crossing a road.

For completeness, the Article lists seven freedoms and one of them is gone. Sub-clause (a) is speech and expression, (b) assembling peaceably and without arms, (c) forming "associations or unions or co-operative societies", (d) and (e) as above, and (g) "to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business." Sub-clause (f), the right to property, was omitted by the Forty-fourth Amendment in 1978, which is why the list jumps from (e) to (g). We set that out because a reader who counts the letters deserves to know why one is missing rather than assume a typing error.

How this connects to a marriage file. Everything on this website about residence rests on a simple proposition: residence is a question of fact about where you actually live, not a line printed on a card in another district or another State. Article 19(1)(e) is the constitutional root of why that proposition is not a convenience we invented. A citizen may reside and settle anywhere in India. A household that lives in Badarpur lives in Badarpur — and if it moves to Faridabad next year, it will live there, and neither move requires anybody's permission or unsettles anything already registered.

And Its Honest Limit

A page that quoted Article 19(1)(e) and stopped would be doing the thing this website exists not to do. The Article carries its own qualification, and it is worth reading.

Article 19(5):

"Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe."

So the right to reside and settle is not absolute. Reasonable restrictions may be imposed by law, on two stated grounds: the interests of the general public, and the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe. Our Munirka page deals with a related point from the other direction, on which marriage law applies where a party is a member of a Scheduled Tribe.

But notice what Article 19(5) does not do, which is the practically important part. It permits restrictions imposed by law, for stated purposes, which a court can test for reasonableness. It does not license a counter, an office, a landlord or a neighbour to decide that somebody does not belong somewhere. Being asked where you live is ordinary. Being told you are not entitled to live there, by anybody other than a law that can be tested, is not.

And three things this page cannot do. It cannot tell you that any particular restriction is or is not reasonable — that is for a court. It cannot tell you how any authority will treat your residence, because that turns on facts and documents we have not seen. And it is not legal advice, here or anywhere else on this site. We are a marriage service that has read the provisions its own clients keep running into. Where a question genuinely turns on constitutional law, the right half-hour is an advocate's.

The Four Provisions, in One Place

Everything quoted above, collected. Each entry is the Constitution's own wording.

What the Border Actually Changes, and What It Does Not

With the constitutional position settled, here is the practical ground, because the two are often confused and the confusion costs people journeys.

What the border does not change. Where the rites were performed — a ceremony at a mandir in Delhi was solemnised in Delhi, full stop. The validity of a registration once made. Whether a certificate will be honoured elsewhere, for the reasons above. And whether you are entitled to live where you live.

What the border does change is narrower, and it is all procedural. Which registering authority a particular address answers to. Which State's rules govern the application you are actually making. How far somebody has to travel for an appointment, a correction or a duplicate copy. And which office somebody will have to write to in fifteen years when a copy is needed.

That last one is the real decision, and it is not a legal question at all. It is a logistics question: whose office do you want to be dealing with over the next twenty years? For a household whose life, work and children's schooling are in Delhi, Delhi. For a household whose centre of gravity has genuinely moved to Faridabad, there. The certificate is honoured either way; the difference is who you have to telephone.

A marriage already performed somewhere else is a separate matter and an easy one. A wedding held years ago in a village in Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar or anywhere else is already a valid marriage — under section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 the customary rites are the solemnising act, so you have been married since that day. Only the record is missing, there is no cut-off for supplying it, and our late registration page sets out the process. The two late amounts Delhi's 2014 Order attaches — ₹500 inside the second sixty-day window and ₹1,000 after it — are both waivable by the ADM or DM, and neither has grown by a rupee however long it has been.

And a practical caution peculiar to a border belt. Do not start the same application in two places. A file opened in Delhi and a second file opened across the border for the same marriage is not twice as safe; it is a way of ending up with two partial applications, two sets of appointments and an inconsistency somebody will eventually ask about. Decide where the file belongs, on a phone call, before anybody submits anything anywhere.

Our Badarpur working guide covers the day-to-day side that this page deliberately leaves alone — the office and the 2026 district map, address proof for tenants, partners from Faridabad or Noida, planning around shift work, what happens at the appointment, and the checklists. This page is the constitutional half: why the document travels, and why you only need one.

Documents From Two States in One Household

The characteristic file from this belt is not short of paper. It has too much, issued by two different States, and none of it agrees.

A typical couple here holds an Aadhaar printed with a Delhi address and a second one printed with a Faridabad sector; a bank account opened on whichever address was convenient in 2019; a driving licence from one State and a vehicle registered in the other; an electricity account in a landlord's name on the Delhi side; and a voters' entry that nobody has looked at since the family shifted.

What the marriage file actually asks for is far narrower than that pile. Identity, age, and the address each of you genuinely occupies now. It does not ask you to reconcile two States' documents with each other. It does not ask you to surrender one licence or re-register a scooter. It does not ask which State you "belong" to, because — as Article 19(1)(e) makes plain — that is not a question the law puts to a citizen.

What it does ask is that the address you give is the one you actually live at, consistently. That is the single most useful thing a couple from this belt can get right. Pick the address that is true, use that exact wording everywhere in the file, and do not improve on it: if the Aadhaar prints less detail than reality, the form still follows the Aadhaar, because a form more precise than its own proof is still a mismatch.

Where one of you has nothing at the Delhi address, the route is to get one honest record standing in that person's own name and let the rest follow — the bank first, the Aadhaar next, the voters' list after. Weeks, not days, which is precisely why this is a call to make a month before fixing a date. Building that first record with nothing to start from is the subject of our Laxmi Nagar page, and the weight an Aadhaar printed in another State really carries is covered on our Timarpur page.

Turn down anybody who offers to “sort out the paperwork” for you. Putting your name against an address you have never lived at gains you nothing and installs a defect on purpose — one that collapses at the single counter where the paper had to hold. In a border belt there is an additional reason to refuse: an address invented on one side of the line is far easier for somebody to check against your records on the other.

Send photographs before anybody takes leave. On WhatsApp, at whatever hour suits the shift. Free, about ten minutes, and in a household holding documents from two States it is the quickest way to find out which ones are going to cause trouble.

Delhi or Faridabad — How the Decision Is Actually Made

This is the call we get asked to make for people, so here is the reasoning rather than a slogan.

First, what is not relevant. Which State the certificate will be "accepted" in — it is honoured throughout India, for the reasons set out above. Which side sounds more official. Which side somebody's cousin used. And whether a future move will undo it, because it will not.

Second, what is relevant. Three things only.

One — where the ceremony was or will be performed. A marriage is solemnised where the rites physically happen. If the wedding is at our mandir, that is Delhi, and that is a fact about the event rather than a choice.

Two — where each of you actually lives, as a matter of fact. Not where a card prints, and not where the family is from. Where you sleep, work from, and receive post.

Three — and this is the one people never think about — where the certificate will be produced over the next twenty years. A bank, a school admission, an employer's records, a passport office, a claim settlement. Whichever State's offices are going to see this document most often is, other things being equal, the better place for the file, because a correction or a duplicate means dealing with the office that holds the register.

And then we say which, on the call, before anything is paid. Including when the honest answer is that your file belongs on the Haryana side and this is not our work — which happens, and we say it rather than take the booking. What we will not do is register the same marriage in both States so that nobody has to decide. That is not caution, it is two files and one day somebody asking why there are two.

Two Witnesses in a Belt People Commute Out Of

What witnesses do is small, and the dread around it is large, so plainly: two people attend, stand before the officer, and put their names to two propositions — that you are the couple the file describes, and that the ceremony took place. Nothing is warranted by them. No obligation follows them afterwards, financial or otherwise. Both of them bring two papers in their own names — one with a photograph on it, one proving an address. None of it is lodged ahead of the day, and a signature cannot be supplied on behalf of anyone who failed to attend. Who qualifies is set out on our witnesses page.

The feature of this belt is that people's lives straddle the line, and so do their witnesses. The friend who signs today may be living in Sector 37 next year, Palwal the year after, and back in a village in Bulandshahr eventually. A certificate, meanwhile, can need a witness traced two decades on.

A witness from across the border is perfectly acceptable. There is no requirement that a witness live in the same State, the same district or the same colony — he brings his own documents showing his own address, wherever that address is. Article 19(1)(e) has already settled where a citizen may live. So choose on findability, not geography.

Prefer permanence over proximity. A relative. Somebody whose family has held the same house for twenty years, on either side. Anybody whose parents' address will still reach him when his own number has changed three times. The colleague from the Faridabad shift who you met in March is the easiest to ask and the hardest to find in 2050.

And take down more than a name. A full name as his own documents give it, a permanent address with the district, and a second contact who is not him. One minute now, and it is the difference between a traceable witness and a dead end.

No signature is bought here. We organise no witnesses at any price, and an offer from any office to supply them deserves a flat refusal on the spot. A name from somebody who was never in the room is a defect introduced on purpose, and it fails at precisely the counter examining the paper hardest.

Where the Certificate Should Live When the Family Is Across the Line

Three certified copies, and in this belt the third has an obvious home. One with the couple. One with family on the Delhi side. One with family on the other side of the border — because the person who eventually needs it in a hurry is as likely to be in Faridabad or back in the home district as in Molarband.

Get three particulars into a notebook in the first week: the office that issued it, the date the entry itself bears, and the number the register gave it. With those, a duplicate years later is one application. Without them, somebody will be working through registers hunting a name beside a year that is only an estimate — and doing it from another State, which is how a week disappears.

Take a picture of it and check that either of you can pull the image up on any phone, then make sure one relative on each side of the line knows how to get at it.

Then read every entry on the day it arrives. Hold it beside the Aadhaar instead of trusting memory, and spend the most attention on the spellings — a name written one way in a village school, differently by a Delhi bank, and a third way by whoever typed the form is the commonest defect in files from a belt where documents come from two States. Then each father's name as he himself spells it, the two dates of birth against whatever age proof went in, the ceremony date, both addresses, and the register's reference. An error caught this month is a form and a short wait. The same error found in twenty years, by an officer in another State deciding a claim, is a far heavier thing — and the distance makes it heavier still.

Which Office, and Why None Is Named Here

You will not find an office named anywhere on this website, and that is deliberate. Where a file belongs follows the address exactly as written; Delhi's sub-divisional boundaries were reworked through 2026; and a name set in type here could be stale by the time a family relied on it and gave up a day's wages travelling. Tell us the address in the Aadhaar's own wording and we will look up, free, where it reports today.

Two reassurances, both of which matter more on a boundary than elsewhere. A boundary redrawn after your certificate was issued leaves that certificate exactly as valid — nothing needs redoing, and Article 261 has already dealt with the question of whether a record from one jurisdiction counts in another. And an old register that nobody can locate has not been destroyed; it has passed to whichever office took over that area. When an old entry has simply gone silent, our Mayur Vihar Phase 2 page works through it properly — ask the office in writing, and reach for RTI only if that produces nothing. A live application that has stopped moving is a different problem, and the Lajpat Nagar page is where it is dealt with, including the Delhi law that sets deadlines for notified services and makes the officer responsible pay the applicant out of his own pocket.

Badarpur and the Belt Along the Border

Ten Things That Go Wrong on This Boundary

One — registering the same marriage in two States "to be safe". There is no legal basis for it. Article 261 directs full faith and credit to the record throughout India. Two files is not twice the protection; it is two files.

Two — paying somebody who offers a second certificate across the border. That offer exists because the fear exists. We will not make it and nobody should accept it.

Three — starting an application on both sides at once. Decide where the file belongs on a phone call, before anything is submitted anywhere.

Four — assuming a daily commute weakens the file. Moving freely across the territory is a right under Article 19(1)(d). Nobody has to explain it.

Five — thinking a later move to Faridabad will undo the registration. It will not. A citizen may reside and settle anywhere under Article 19(1)(e), and a record already made stays made.

Six — giving the address that sounds better instead of the one you live at. Pick the true one, use its exact wording everywhere, and do not add detail the Aadhaar does not carry.

Seven — ruling out a witness because he lives in Haryana. No rule requires it. He brings his own documents showing his own address.

Eight — choosing a witness met on a recent shift. Easiest to ask, hardest to trace in twenty years. Choose for permanence, on either side.

Nine — keeping every copy on one side of the border. The person who needs it urgently is as likely to be on the other.

Ten — thinking a wedding in the village all those years back never really counted. Section 7 made you husband and wife the day the rites were done. What is missing is the entry, nothing else, and no deadline has run out for getting one.

What We Charge

Our prices in full. Duplicates, corrections to an entry, apostille handling, the managed option and what the government collects separately are all itemised on the fee page.

What the State collects is nothing to do with our fee, and every item of it is receipted to you directly: ₹100 for the Marriage Clerk, ₹200 attaching to the application itself under Delhi's 2014 Order, plus ₹15 for the District cashier if the civil route is the one you take. For a wedding from an earlier year the same Order lays down two more amounts — ₹500 while you are still inside the second sixty-day period, ₹1,000 after it closes — and the ADM or DM may set aside either. Neither one has risen by a paisa across however many years have passed.

Nine things cannot be bought here, whatever is offered. We will not find you witnesses. We will not put down a date that never happened. We will not hand over a certificate when only one of you came. We will not register the same marriage a second time in another State, and we will not take money to do it. We will not promise what any officer or court is going to decide. We execute no decree, conduct no proceedings and appear before no court, tribunal or authority. We take no succession, inheritance or property matter. We offer no opinion on anybody's caste or community. And we neither propose nor arrange a conversion. When the truthful reply is that your file belongs on the Haryana side, or that an advocate rather than a marriage service is what you need, it comes on the first call and costs nothing — even though saying it usually ends the call.

Sources, and What This Page Cannot Say

Sourced — the Constitution of India. Article 261, quoted whole in all three clauses: (1) "Full faith and credit shall be given throughout the territory of India to public acts, records and judicial proceedings of the Union and of every State"; (2) "The manner in which and the conditions under which the acts, records and proceedings referred to in clause (1) shall be proved and the effect thereof determined shall be as provided by law made by Parliament"; and (3) "Final judgments or orders delivered or passed by civil courts in any part of the territory of India shall be capable of execution anywhere within that territory according to law." Article 19(1), opening "All citizens shall have the right—", with (a) "to freedom of speech and expression", (b) "to assemble peaceably and without arms", (c) "to form associations or unions or co-operative societies", (d) "to move freely throughout the territory of India", (e) "to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India", and (g) "to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business" — sub-clause (f) having been omitted by the Forty-fourth Amendment, 1978. And Article 19(5), quoted whole, permitting "reasonable restrictions" on sub-clauses (d) and (e) "either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe."

Each provision above was read in the Constitution's own text and confirmed against a second independent published copy.

Described rather than quoted. The extent provision of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 applies that Act across the country and also to Hindus domiciled in the territories to which it extends who are outside them. Older printings of that sub-section carry an exception for the State of Jammu and Kashmir which was overtaken by the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019; because published texts still differ on the exact current wording, it is summarised here rather than quoted, and nothing on this page rests on its precise words. The evidence-law provisions on public documents are set out on our Jahangirpuri page rather than repeated here.

Sourced — the marriage provisions. Three provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: s.7, making the performance of either party's customary rites the operative act; s.5(ii), under which willingness is a condition of validity; and s.8, enacted expressly to facilitate proof of a marriage. Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, under which a marriage "between any two persons" may be solemnised, carrying with it that statute's own residence requirement and the thirty days a notice stays open to objection. Order 8, the ₹200 that attaches to an application, the sixty-day period and the pair of late figures all come out of Delhi's 2014 Order. For the ₹100 and ₹15 items, and for the turnaround it holds itself to, the source is the Delhi Revenue Department. BNS s.236 is the provision on untrue declarations, and the apostille and attestation rates are the Ministry of External Affairs' own published figures.

What this page cannot say. How any particular office, clerk or authority will in fact behave — Article 261 binds the State and settles the legal position, and it is not a remedy you can hand across a counter. Whether any restriction on residence is or is not a reasonable one, which is for a court. Whether any person's residence will be accepted by any authority, which turns on facts and documents we have never seen. What any State's own registration rules require, since this page addresses the constitutional position and not the procedure of any State other than Delhi. Which office serves a given address, allotted on the exact address after the 2026 boundary changes. And nothing here is legal advice. Plainly: our work is performing marriages and getting them registered, once. We execute no judgment, conduct no proceedings, appear before no court, tribunal or authority, take no succession, inheritance or property matter, and are paid nothing for any of that. These Articles are set out here because the question this belt asks most has a clear constitutional answer that almost nobody has been shown, and because the answer saves families from paying twice for one marriage. Where a question genuinely turns on constitutional law, an advocate's half-hour is what it needs, and free legal aid is available to a woman with no income test at all.

Before You Call

One — say which side of the border each of you actually lives on, and where the ceremony is to be or was performed. Those two facts settle the route and the fee between them.

Two — have both Aadhaar cards in front of you and read us the address each one prints, rather than the address you would recite. If the two cards name two different States, say so straight away; it is the ordinary position here and it decides less than families fear.

Three — tell us where you expect to be living in five years, if you have any idea. Not because it affects validity, which it does not, but because it is the one thing that genuinely bears on which office you would rather be dealing with for the next twenty.

Call +91 8376863962. Money does not enter the conversation until you have heard the route your facts put you on, our charge for it, and what the government takes separately. And if the truthful answer is that your file belongs on the other side of that road, or that an advocate is who you actually need, you will hear it — at no cost for having asked.

Badarpur and the Border — Your Questions55 Questions Answered